Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Ms. lat. 1534

Settlement
Paris
Repository
Bibliothèque nationale de France
Shelfmark
Ms. lat. 1534
Creator of the description
Matthias M. Tischler
Initial encoding
Not specified
Revisions
2024-05-20 (Clara Renedo i Mirambell): Revised encoding and content.
2025-08-18 (Victor Portella i Pahissa): Revised and added content.
Dating
1st quarter of the 9th c. (until 821)
Place of origin / provenance
Benedict of Aniane’s Aachen scriptorium
Successive provenance(s)
Carcassonne Cathedral
Online catalogues
Archives et manuscrits - BnF
Scans
Quote as
Matthias M. Tischler, 'Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Ms. lat. 1534', Carolingian Catalonia Database, <https://ciceronianus.github.io/carolingian.cat/html/pages/manuscripts/paris_bnf_ms_lat_01534.html> [generated on 30 August 2026].

1r-115v, - Institutio canonicorum Aquisgranensis a. 816

Here reworked prologue, ch. 113 end (inc.: “Quia ergo constat … “) – 145 and ch. 1–113 end (expl.: “... et tamen vobiscum ibi regnemus”), but without the “capitulatio” and ch. 11. The fol. 1r–7v are a younger replacement of the 11th century. The manuscript has a 13th-century exlibris on fol. 1r: “Iste liber est ecclesie sancti Nazarij Carcassonensis quicumque eum furatus fuerit vel celaverit vel hunc titulum deleverit anathema sit”. This early copy is mentioned in the catalogue of the library of Carcassonne Cathedral: “Instructio Sacri Concilii Aquisgrani celebrati an. Domini 816”, Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum ecclesiae S. Nazarii Carcassonae, p. 1353 col. a l. 7 sq. The erroneous transcription finds its explantion in the artificial majuscules used for the title. Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum 1744a, p. 146 col. b (“Is codex nono saeculo exaratus videtur”); Conciliorum Galliae Collectio 1789, p. VI; MAASSEN 1866, p. 199; DELISLE 1874, p. 348; WERMINGHOFF 1899, p. 481 (“s. IX.”); WERMINGHOFF 1901a, p. 18 (with the wrong date “saec. XI. XII. und IX. X.”); WERMINGHOFF 1902a, p. 638 with n. 1; WERMINGHOFF 1906, p. 311 no 39 (“saec. IX.–XII. (saec. XI. XII. praef. mut., cc. mut. – 145, saec. IX. X. cc. 1–133)”); LEHMANN 1911, p. 139 n. 1; LAUER 1940, p. 57 sq.; RAMBAUD-BUHOT 1965, p. 330 with n. 28; MAGNOU-NORTIER 1974, p. 415 n. 110 and p. 489; SCHIEFFER 1976, p. 250 n. 108 (“nicht mehr dem 9. Jh. zuzuweisend”); BISCHOFF 1981a, p. 13; HUGLO 1982, p. 118 with n. 95, p. 119 with n. 99 and 101 and p. 145 (“Recueil des conciles (Xe s.), Carcassonne”; on the added musical notes at the end of the copy of the Institutio canonicorum Aquisgranensis a. 816; manuscript Pa 1534); LANGEFELD 1986 (with the wrong assumption that the manuscript contains a copy of Chrodegang of Metz’s Regula canonicorum); MORDEK 1995a, p. 1050; SEMMLER 1995, p. 70 with n. 69; SCHILP 1998, p. 104 with n. 36 (“entstanden noch im 9. Jahrhundert”; with the wrong date of the exlibris “12. Jahrhundert”); SCHILP 2005, p. 175 with n. 51 (“wahrscheinlich aus der Umgebung von Carcassonne”); SCHMITZ 2007, p. 511, p. 512 with n. 73 sq. and p. 514; BISCHOFF 2014, p. 34 no 4022 (“Südliches Frankreich (?), IX. Jh., ca. 3. Viertel”); ENGELBERT 2016a, p. 49 sq. with n. 151; ENGELBERT 2016b, p. 143 fig. 2 (fol. 125r) and p. 147–149 (“Skriptorium lag wohl in einem südfranzösischen Kloster ... auf das erste Viertel des IX. Jahrhunderts zu datieren”); VEYRENCHE 2023, p. 112 n. 41. JULLIEN/PERELMAN 1994, p. 141 sq. and 231 mention no manuscripts. The erroneous transcription finds its explantion in the artificial majuscules used for the title. Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum 1744a, p. 146 col. b (“Is codex nono saeculo exaratus videtur”); Conciliorum Galliae Collectio 1789, p. VI; MAASSEN 1866, p. 199; DELISLE 1874, p. 348; WERMINGHOFF 1899, p. 481 (“s. IX.”); WERMINGHOFF 1901a, p. 18 (with the wrong date “saec. XI. XII. und IX. X.”); WERMINGHOFF 1902a, p. 638 with n. 1; WERMINGHOFF 1906, p. 311 no 39 (“saec. IX.–XII. (saec. XI. XII. praef. mut., cc. mut. – 145, saec. IX. X. cc. 1–133)”); LEHMANN 1911, p. 139 n. 1; LAUER 1940, p. 57 sq.; RAMBAUD-BUHOT 1965, p. 330 with n. 28; MAGNOU-NORTIER 1974, p. 415 n. 110 and p. 489; SCHIEFFER 1976, p. 250 n. 108 (“nicht mehr dem 9. Jh. zuzuweisend”); BISCHOFF 1981a, p. 13; HUGLO 1982, p. 118 with n. 95, p. 119 with n. 99 and 101 and p. 145 (“Recueil des conciles (Xe s.), Carcassonne”; on the added musical notes at the end of the copy of the Institutio canonicorum Aquisgranensis a. 816; manuscript Pa 1534); LANGEFELD 1986, p. ● (with the wrong assumption that the manuscript contains a copy of Chrodegang of Metz’s Regula canonicorum); MORDEK 1995, p. 1050; SEMMLER 1995, p. 70 with n. 69; SCHILP 1998, p. 104 with n. 36 (“entstanden noch im 9. Jahrhundert”; with the wrong date of the exlibris “12. Jahrhundert”); SCHILP 2005, p. 175 with n. 51 (“wahrscheinlich aus der Umgebung von Carcassonne”); SCHMITZ 2007, p. 511, p. 512 with n. 73 sq. and p. 514; BISCHOFF 2014, p. 34 no 4022 (“Südliches Frankreich (?), IX. Jh., ca. 3. Viertel”); ENGELBERT 2016a, p. 49 sq. with n. 151; ENGELBERT 2016b, p. 143 fig. 2 (fol. 125r) and p. 147–149 (“Skriptorium lag wohl in einem südfranzösischen Kloster ... auf das erste Viertel des IX. Jahrhunderts zu datieren”); VEYRENCHE 2023, p. 112 n. 41.. JULLIEN/PERELMAN 1994, p. 141 sq. and 231 mention no manuscripts.

116r-132r, Sine Auctore - Institutio sanctimonalium Aquisgranensis a. 816

Here in a mutilated form concerning c. 1–3, 5–13 and 15–18. The manuscript has a 13th-century exlibris on fol. 1r: “Iste liber est ecclesie sancti Nazarij Carcassonensis quicumque eum furatus fuerit vel celaverit vel hunc titulum deleverit anathema sit”. This early copy is behind the entry in the catalogue of the library of Carcassonne Cathedral: “Instructio Sacri Concilii Aquisgrani celebrati an. Domini 816”, Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum ecclesiae S. Nazarii Carcassonae, p. 1353 col. a l. 7 sq.: Catalogus codicum manuscriptorum 1744a, p. 146 col. b (“Is codex nono saeculo exaratus videtur”); Conciliorum Galliae Collectio 1789, p. VI; MAASSEN 1866, p. 199; DELISLE 1874, p. 348; WERMINGHOFF 1899, p. 482 (“s. IX.”); WERMINGHOFF 1901a, p. 18 (with the wrong date “saec. XI. XII. und IX. X.”); WERMINGHOFF 1902a, p. 634 sq. with n. 7 (with the probably wrong reference to HARDOUIN 1714, col. 1147 (“Hujus libri codex Ms. nunc est in Bibliotheca Colbert, olim in Thuana”)) and p. 636; WERMINGHOFF 1906, p. 422 no 4 (manuscript P 2; “saec. X.”); LEHMANN 1911, p. 139 n. 1; LAUER 1940, p. 57 sq. (“IXe et XIIe s.”); BISCHOFF 1981a, p. 13; MORDEK 1995a, p. 1057; SEMMLER 1995, p. 70 with n. 69; SCHILP 1998, p. 104 sq. with n. 36 and 38 (“entstanden noch im 9. Jahrhundert”; with the wrong date of the exlibris “12. Jahrhundert”); SCHILP 2005, p. 175 with n. 51 (“wahrscheinlich aus der Umgebung von Carcassonne”); SCHMITZ 2007, p. 500, 511, p. 512 sq. with n. 73–80, p. 514 and 532; TURCAN-VERKERK 2007, p. 315 n. 141; BISCHOFF 2014, p. 34 sq. no 4023 (“Gleiches Skriptorium wie die vorige Nummer [i. e. “Südliches Frankreich (?)”] (?), IX. Jh., ca. Mitte”); ENGELBERT 2016a, p. 49 sq. with n. 151; ENGELBERT 2016b, p. 143 fig. 2 (fol. 125r) and p. 147–149 (“Skriptorium lag wohl in einem südfranzösischen Kloster ... auf das erste Viertel des IX. Jahrhunderts zu datieren”). JULLIEN/PERELMAN 1994, p. 141 sq. and 231 mention no manuscripts.